![]() ![]() ![]() Intellectual issues are certainly real and play some role, but I guess I've grown tired of the endless, hateful rhetoric between religious believers and non-believers. Over the years I've come to feel that most people, including me, believe the things they believe mostly for complex emotional, social, and experiential reasons. Chesterton's whirlwind tour through his philosophy of life, morality, mysticism, religion, and the universe, among other things, has given me much to think about. Chesterton's Orthodoxy, and I have to say the man was brilliant, witty, passionate, and more than a little strange. Resources are deemed insufficient to explain an improbable event. Inflation of one’s probabilistic resources when the known probabilistic ![]() Critics charge that the multiverse theory is an artificial Plausible explanation, not because there was any empirical evidence supporting The hypothesis was invoked specifically to render chance a But without any independent evidence, it necessarily remains speculativeĪnd ad hoc. Hypothesis, like the multiverse hypothesis, therefore possesses explanatory Hypothesis that could explain this event would be to suggest that the forest Illustration I’ve read is as follows: An arrow is randomly fired into a hugeįorest. At least one universe of the millions isīound to have the set of properties required for life. ![]() There are perhaps an infinite number of universes. To make chance a plausible explanation, we posit that Universe having the exact set of properties that it does, ones that allow life,Īre exceedingly slim. My understanding of the multiverse is that it was postulatedĪs an explanation for our universe’s improbable existence. He insisted that we are simply following theĮquations when we posit the existence of the multiverse. The known fundamental mathematical equations that govern our universe indicate Greene was adamant that it did not require faith, that On the idea of a multiverse, and was asked if the multiverse was really more ofĪn object of faith than of science, since we don’t have any observationalĮvidence that it exists. In the course of the discussion, Greene was pushed If millions of different universesĮxist, it is difficult to see how a single theory could explain everythingĪbout all those universes. On the possibility of a theory of everything. Recently someĬosmologists have been thinking about the implications of the multiverse theory Possibility of a theory of everything (a fundamental theory of physics thatĬould in principle explain everything else about the universe). Heard an interview with the physicist Brian Greene. Just be careful or you might accidentally set the whole forest on fire.I was listening to a podcast of Radio Lab yesterday, and You Have to Burn the Web: And a bunch of other things.Set Piece Puzzle: Often you come across deadly creatures that need to be surpassed by guiding other facets of the environment in their direction to distract or move them.Scenery Porn: Just watch where you're goi-Tsugh!.Pulling Themselves Together: After "ripping", the pieces of the protagonist come back together at the last checkpoint.Not the Fall That Kills You : If you keep turning the world, you can survive indefinitely, but you keep your momentum, so you will still rip if you touch ground.Justified, of course, since you are made of paper and that's exactly what happens. Never Say "Die": When you fall too far, you "rip".Mushroom Samba: After getting bitten by a snake in the forest world, everything breathes and becomes colorful.Literary Allusion Title: Legend has it that after The Spanish Inquisition forced Galileo to recant his theory that the Earth revolves around the Sun, Galileo said " E pur si muove " or "And yet it moves.". ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |